Everyone seems to have an opinion on the budget crisis. The countdown to default continues and the Tea Party has sounded off on their point of view. Now a group of progressives have sounded off as well. They are demanding Congress not cut Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Is this group trying to create their own tea party? Richard Eskow, senior fellow of the Campaign for America’s Future, explains this progressive movement. Follow Kristine on Twitter at twitter.com

By Patriot-News Op-Ed

May 31, 2010, 12:27PM

More excited about voting in midterm elections than most Americans, tea party adherents burst into view in the primaries with Rand Paul’s victory over the endorsed Republican in Kentucky, Gov. Charlie Crist’s defection in Florida and the defeat of Sen. Robert Bennett in Utah.

But here in Pennsylvania, the tea partiers barely registered at the polls, giving the nod to all except one state legislative incumbent.

In the state’s only bellwether election for the seat of the late Jack Murtha, the Democratic king of pork got the last laugh as one of his former staffers, Mark Critz, decisively defeated Republican Tim Burns, the darling of Sen. Scott Brown, who traveled from Massachusetts to stump for him.
alan kennedy shaffer.JPGAlan Kennedy Shaffer is author of “The Obama Revolution.”
Combined with Sen. Arlen Specter’s unexpected loss to self-proclaimed “lifetime Democrat” Joe Sestak, Mark Critz’s victory showed that Democrats can still win elections against Republicans and Democrats heavily criticized for having formerly been Republicans.

This is a good thing. As much as I hated to see a second Senate candidate endorsed by President Barack Obama lose, I will be the first to admit that what America needs now is not a kingmaker, but a leader willing to make tough decisions. My president, a pragmatic visionary who energized a generation and brought the Republican Party to its knees, needs to reclaim the American dream.

What America needs now is not pork barrel politics but more progressive policies on health insurance, derivative trading and oil spills. What America needs now is not stagnating incumbents willing to bend the rules for personal gain and corporate profit, but more young visionaries willing to cross the aisle for the common good.

What America needs now is not Glenn Beck’s rants, Bob McDonnell’s Confederate history month and Rand Paul’s opposition to civil rights, but more recognition of how far we have come since George W. Bush left office — and how far we still have to go.

Americans have weathered the worst of a Great Recession precipitated by Wall Street irresponsibility. Congress has passed the most important piece of social legislation in decades, and nations alienated by Bush’s cowboy attitude have come back to the diplomatic negotiating table.

But too often, corporate interests still control the legislative process, partisan invective still poisons the political well, and incumbency protection is still alive. Where the tea party went wrong was not its populism, but in its vision for America.

It is time to crash the tea party by keeping what is good about it — populism, electoral excitement, fiscal responsibility — and replacing the bad — xenophobia, homophobia, sexism.

If we are to persuade our president and congressional leaders to take the necessary next steps to effectively regulate the oil, mining, financial and insurance industries and stop bailing out the worst offenders on Wall Street, we must add progressive ideals to the tea party. We must demand an end to Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, send a message to executives that no bank is too big to fail, and make an example of BP.

Only by taking to the streets once more will we reclaim the fervor that made Obama president.

Alan Kennedy-Shaffer of Harrisburg is the author of “The Obama Revolution.” He will sign books Saturday at the Midtown Scholar Bookstore.

View full post on tea party – Google News


One of the characteristics of “progressivism” is the spinning of what one says – to say whatever one wants it to say. It is backed by a philosophy that says the end justifies the means to an extreme. In other words, one says what he has to say in order to get to where he intends to go. This was seen in the healthcare debate when the liberal left continually heaped the entire blame for escalating health care costs on the insurance industry. No mention was made of wasteful uses of insurance benefits, underpaid Medicare/Medicaid payments to doctors and hospitals, treatment of self-imposed addictions and obesity, overcharges by hospitals, etc.

Another characteristic of “progressivism” is the smoke screening of reality by the careful fabrication of words and phrases such as “dozens” instead of “thousands”. If there really are thousands, but the word “dozens” is used to describe the number – it is not really a lie because enough dozens do multiply and/or add up into the thousands. The most important issue for the progressives is not the facts, but the perception they create of the facts in order to accomplish their agenda.

Harry Reid is a master of progressive rhetoric. He once said, “It’s time that America’s government lived by the same values as America’s families. It’s time we invested in America’s future and made sure our people have the skills to compete and thrive in a 21st century economy. That’s what Democrats believe.” What exactly are “the same values as American families” to Harry Reid who has promoted and propagated every possible piece of legislation he can that is diametrically opposed to American family values? Consider this Harry Reid quote from the Democratic minority days when Bush was in office, “The American people do not like privatization. They are afraid of the debt the president’s willing to do. And they don’t like benefit cuts. And everyone here should understand all 45 Senate Democrats are united. We are not going to let this happen.” Hmmmmm….the American people do not like privatization? Reid concerned the people fear Bush’s debt yet he has supported Obama’s increasing mountain of debt every step of the way? Reid concerned about benefit cuts, something the health care bill will cut?

In more recent memory, Reid said of the Republican opposition to health care reform, “Instead of joining us on the right side of history, all Republicans have come up with is this slow down, stop everything, let’s start over. You think you’ve heard these same excuses before, you’re right. When this country belatedly recognized the wrongs of slavery, there were those who dug in their heels and said, slow down, it’s too early.” The reality is that the slaves were freed under Republican leadership with the Democrats in opposition. Little did the facts matter to Reid who was painting a picture of a “regressive” Republican Party. He did not say the say Republicans held up slavery, but anyone who does not know their American history would come to that conclusion which was what Reid intended through the fabrication of his words.

It is time to take action against the progressive rhetoric of Harry Reid and others like him. As Americans, we have the privilege of hiring and firing our elected officials through the ballot box. It is our right to put a stop to those who are violating our rights by voting them out, but it is up to us to exercise that right. Be a responsible voter in 2010 – America is depending upon it!

Help us defeat Harry Reid at DumpReid.com!



View full post on Tax Day Tea Party




The Patriot Caucus




logo

One of the characteristics of “progressivism” is the spinning of what one says – to say whatever one wants it to say. It is backed by a philosophy that says the end justifies the means to an extreme. In other words, one says what he has to say in order to get to where he intends to go. This was seen in the healthcare debate when the liberal left continually heaped the entire blame for escalating health care costs on the insurance industry. No mention was made of wasteful uses of insurance benefits, underpaid Medicare/Medicaid payments to doctors and hospitals, treatment of self-imposed addictions and obesities, overcharges by hospitals, etc.

Another characteristic of “progressivism” is the smoke screening of reality by the careful fabrication of words and phrases such as “dozens” instead of “thousands”. If there really are thousands, but the word “dozens” is used to describe the number – it is not really a lie because enough dozens do multiply and/or add up into the thousands. The most important issue for the progressives is not the facts, but the perception they create of the facts in order to accomplish their agenda.

Harry Reid is a master of progressive rhetoric. He once said, “It’s time that America’s government lived by the same values as America’s families. It’s time we invested in America’s future and made sure our people have the skills to compete and thrive in a 21st century economy. That’s what Democrats believe.” What exactly are “the same values as American families” to Harry Reid who has promoted and propagated every possible piece of legislation he can that is diametrically opposed to American family values? Consider this Harry Reid quote from the Democratic minority days when Bush was in office, “The American people do not like privatization. They are afraid of the debt the president’s willing to do. And they don’t like benefit cuts. And everyone here should understand all 45 Senate Democrats are united. We are not going to let this happen.” Hmmmmm….the American people do not like privatization? Reid concerned the people fear Bush’s debt yet he has supported Obama’s increasing mountain of debt every step of the way? Reid concerned about benefit cuts, something the health care bill will cut?

In more recent memory, Reid said of the Republican opposition to health care reform, “Instead of joining us on the right side of history, all Republicans have come up with is this slow down, stop everything, let’s start over. You think you’ve heard these same excuses before, you’re right. When this country belatedly recognized the wrongs of slavery, there were those who dug in their heels and said, slow down, it’s too early.” The reality is that the slaves were freed under Republican leadership with the Democrats in opposition. Little did the facts matter to Reid who was painting a picture of a “regressive” Republican Party. He did not say the say Republicans held up slavery, but anyone who does not know their American history would come to that conclusion which was what Reid intended through the fabrication of his words.

It is time to take action against the progressive rhetoric of Harry Reid and others like him. As Americans, we have the privilege of hiring and firing our elected officials through the ballot box. It is our right to put a stop to those who are violating our rights by voting them out, but it is up to us to exercise that right. Be a responsible voter in 2010 – America is depending upon it!

Help us defeat Harry Reid at DumpReid.com!







One Response to “Harry Reid – The Definition of Progressive Rhetoric”



  1. Do not infight. Stick to the 9/12 principles or something VERY SIMILAR. Something tangible, concrete that cannot have much debate. The “Constitution” would be great or a contract of things to accomplish. Not emotional wants, wishes or desires. Ther are a lot of working people/conservative, silent majority constitution, freedom, liberty loving and breathing AMERICANSs that are going to vote in huge numbers soon. This has been one hell of a wake up call! Ronald Reagan could not have been more correct, we are but one generation from losing this country. We will march to victory then let us please teach our children “History and Government” in a way that is interesting that they can relate to and enjoy so they will get involved. We may be silent but we are the educated majority. Let’s educate our offspring before they do.


Leave a Reply





logo

View full post on Tax Day Tea Party